.25 lb.or16%
MORE ADG
Summary of 5 research studies: Gray. H. C., 2013., Dhuyvetter, D.V., 1995., Allison, B.C., 1989., Thome, D.D., 1987., Hatfield, E.E., 1975.
What to Expect for Feedlot Performance
Ohio State Feedlot Study
| Item | Treatments, g/day | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1.5 | 3 | |
| Initial Weight | 527 | 527 | 528 |
| Day 7 Weight | 531 | 533 | 538 |
| ADG, lb/d | 0.61 | 0.73 | 1.23 |
| DMI, lb/d | 9.9 | 9.9 | 9.9 |
| G:F, lb/lb | 0.030 | 0.033 | 0.061 |
Nickles, 2016
Effects of Amaferm or Yeast on Feedlot Performance
| Supplement Type | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Control | Yeast | AMAFERM | |
| Pens | 8 | 8 | 8 |
| In wt, lb | 660 | 658 | 660 |
| Final wt, lb | 1219 | 1219 | 1225 |
| Days on Feed | 149 | 150 | 150 |
| ADG, lb/d | 3.75 | 3.74 | 3.77 |
| DMI, lb | 18.5 | 18.3 | 18.0 |
Zerby, 2011
The Difference - Research-Backed
Amaferm is research-proven with over 111+ published and/or presented research studies proving its increase in digestibility and ultimately its impact on the animal.
x10+1=
111+
Results are based on 50+ years of extensive published research.
